In Part 1 of this blog post, I looked at the current state of new donor recruitment in the UK where many charities are finding it increasingly hard to find new supporters at an acceptable cost. The channels and methods that have worked in the past are increasingly congested, are limited by regulatory changes and are facing steadily declining response rates. From direct mail to face to face to telephone fundraising, the major routes to market for many charities are becoming decreasingly viable.
In the previous post I said that there was, however, a positive fundraising future for non-profits to look forward to. Not, or not only, online which for charities has been much hyped and little delivered. But integrated multi-channel marketing which has data at its core.
What do I mean by this? The future for non-profit marketing I think is exactly the same as its for profit equivalents. The companies who are conquering the world of commerce are, essentially giant databases. Think Amazon, Google, Facebook. Uber, Airbnb. Kickstarter. Their business model is based on customers giving them their data and using that information to market back to them. These are businesses built by coders and data analysts, commerce reduced to an endless stream of yes/no answers.
I can’t off-hand think of a single charity that is run like this. The nearest is Charity:Water where the website was built first and then the charity around it. But in most charities, the database is the box in the corner that only one person, whose status is only slightly higher than the office junior’s knows how to use. Or there are twenty different databases in the organisation, one for each work group none of which talk to each other in any meaningful way. Most charities don’t employ people whose expertise is in actually understanding the data that’s in such systems and that data by and large isn’t used to drive the important decisions of the organisation.
I don’t actually think this approach has worked terribly well up to now. But it certainly won’t work going forward. Because to me the future of charity marketing looks like the ability to communicate with supporters individually at scale across multiple channels and platforms consecutively. Digital technology means that we can track every interaction with an individual across every possible channel and bring all that information together to allow us to target appropriate communications at them.
Marketing campaigns of the future will move from a small number of big activities, a mailing with a dozen segments, say or a face to face campaign to thousands of different, dynamic interactions across multiple media . All of which interrelate in real time, meaning we are endlessly re segmenting individuals based on their behaviour to bring them the most relevant content. Every interaction is tracked ensuring that the media mix constantly changes as money and effort moves to what is working today.
That sounds very simple in theory. But is extremely hard to do at an organisational level across every platform and channel.
There are number of major barriers that charities need to overcome to be able to succeed in a multi-channel world. For one thing, only a truly integrated approach will work and charities are awful at integration. Silos proliferate in all sizes of non-profits and key functions are often divided by unbridgeable walls. What the rest of the world considers to be marketing, charities frequently divide into “fundraising” and “communications”, put under different managers with conflicting objectives and populate with staff who talk different languages to each other.
The systems and technology charities use are frequently outdated and mutually incompatible. The sort of software that any small business can these days use for a modest fee typically offers levels of integration, functionality and simplicity that the creaking accounting and fundraising systems used by so many charities can only dream about.
There is then the massive issue of expertise. It’s not just about having people who are digitally minded, it’s having people who are able to look at large quantities of data and turn into actionable information. These skills are not just needed by specialist analysts but in staff at all levels up to the most senior leadership. People who not only can, well do sums (an issue in some places) but are properly data minded.
I suspect what we will see is a massive shake out as the organisations who manage to properly embrace the new approaches thrive at the expense of those who don’t. It will be fascinating to see who the winners and losers will be.
One thought on “Where do we get new donors from? Part 2”
Nice article. It is certainly the way forward but agree the charity sector is a long way from this. Systems are available but as you say it is having the right expertise, people and processes to make these systems work. Fundamental changes in the way charities operate and evaluate will be needed but where do we start?